«Der Staat ist eine Institution, die von Banden geführt wird, die aus Mördern, Plünderern und Dieben besteht, umgeben von willfährigen Handlangern, Propagandisten, Speichelleckern, Gaunern, Lügnern, Clowns, Scharlatanen, Blendern und nützlichen Idioten - eine Institution, die alles verdreckt und verdunkelt, was sie berührt.» (– Prof. Hans-Hermann Hoppe).
Externe Ticker
Selenskys erfolglose Reise zu Trump und die Frage, wie der Lebensstandard in Russland ist
Christdemokrat Paz Pereira gewinnt Stichwahl in Bolivien
The Imperial Propaganda Machine Is Failing In Unprecedented Ways, by Caitlin Johnstone
Who Buried the Investigation of Charlie Kirk’s Murder?, by Paul Craig Roberts
Kubas Nationaler Verteidigungsrat tagt unter Verschluss
30 Years of Failure: How U.S.-Venezuela Relations Spiraled Into Military Confrontation, by Jose Alberto Nino
I’m Working on All the Stuff, by Andrew Anglin
A Tale of Two Chants: Why Starmer Now Casts Even the British Police as Antisemitic, by Jonathan Cook
David Irving: The Historian Who Destroys the Holocaust Establishment, by Jonas E. Alexis
John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill, by Ron Unz
Kinder Surprise: The Downsides of Adopting Racially Alien Children, by Will Fredericks
Only 49% of Americans Support Designating Antifa a Terrorist Organization, by Paul Craig Roberts
The Budapest Gambit: Trump and Putin Rewrite the Rules of Power — Where Is Europe?, by J. Ricardo Martins
Wie in Russland über das anstehende Treffen von Putin und Trump berichtet wird
Uruguay legalisiert Sterbehilfe
Israel Flipped Out And Killed 45 Palestinians After Running Over Their Own Bomb
Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):
❖
In today’s news, Israel’s stupid fucking genocidal rapists ran over an unexploded ordnance from their own evil carpet bombing campaign, blamed Hamas for the explosion, started bombing the fuck out of Gaza again, killed scores of civilians, said they were once again cutting off aid to the enclave, and then quietly backed down on urging from Washington.
Rather than report that Israel violated the ceasefire agreement as blatantly as any agreement could possibly be violated, the western press have been referring to this as a “test” of the ceasefire. Killing Palestinians is so normalized and accepted as a baseline expectation in the western press that CNN called it the “first major test” of the ceasefire after Israel killed people in Gaza every single day since the ceasefire agreement was signed.
I hope the “WHY AREN’T YOU CELEBRATING?” crowd have gotten their answer by now. We weren’t celebrating because we know more than you. We’ve actually been paying attention, so we know Israel is going to seek out every excuse to kill Palestinians and torch this fake “ceasefire”.
The Israeli government keep issuing statements making it explicitly clear that Israel will not consider the “war” over until Hamas is fully disarmed and Gaza is fully demilitarized, terms that the Palestinian resistance has explicitly refused. These mutually contradictory positions place Gaza on a collision course toward full-scale reignition of the genocide.
❖
For the last two years anyone who criticized these massacres would be told "tell Hamas to free the hostages then". The hostages are free and the massacres are still happening. https://t.co/cn4rGXPW6L
— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) October 18, 2025Whenever I talk about the IDF massacring civilians for inadvertently traveling into zones Israel has banned them from in Gaza I’ve been getting Israel apologists bleating “but they crossed the Yellow Line!” at me, which I guess is the new hasbara narrative.
Imagine thinking this is a good argument. Imagine thinking it’s perfectly reasonable to blow up a car full of children if they cross a made-up invisible line.
Think about how dehumanized Palestinians would have to be in your mind to believe this is a sane and reasonable position to have. To feel that deadly force via heavy war machinery is a perfectly fine way of administering crowd control.
Imagine if that was happening in your country. If police just blew up your vehicle if you accidentally turned onto a one-way street or made an unauthorized U-turn. If they could send a drone to go pick you off if you were walking down a street they didn’t think you should be on.
You’d never stand for it. You’d demand they find other ways to direct traffic besides deadly force.
“How about some signs?” you would say. “How about using verbal warnings and loudspeakers? How about road blocks? How about just not fucking murdering a vehicle full of kids for moving in an unauthorized way?”
But because it’s Palestinians, it never occurs to them that this should be the expectation. Palestinians deserve to be executed for the slightest transgression against the most arbitrary restriction.
Israel does this all the time, and its defenders are fine with it. During the aid distribution at GHF sites Israeli soldiers have told the Israeli press that they were ordered to fire upon anyone who moved in an unauthorized way, killing starving civilians every single day for seeking food. During the last “ceasefire” at the beginning of the year civilians would routinely get murdered for taking a donkey cart down the wrong road or whatever.
That’s the sort of thing people support of they stand by Israel. Supporting Israel is an innately racist and murderous position, because you support murdering Palestinian civilians for reasons you would never accept your own people being killed for.
❖
Israeli right wingers have been filmed literally pushing their babies in front of aid trucks in order to block food from getting to starving civilians.
I mean, fuck. Israelis are something else.
❖
Israel cannot stop murdering and abusing and sowing chaos and destruction for even one fucking day and the western empire cannot stop supporting it for even an instant, but if you say anything about this people start making up weird stories about you hating the religion of Judaism.
❖
The Trump administration has ordered the repatriation to Colombia and Ecuador of the survivors of its attack on a boat in the Caribbean Sea, which punches some major plot holes in its claim that it has been blowing up these boats because they are full of Venezuelan “narco-terrorists”. The US isn’t generally in the habit of sending terrorists home, so it’s clear they targeted innocent people and had no case against them.
Anyone buying into the war propaganda about Venezuela is a fucking moron. The lies are dumb even by usual US warmongering standards, and US regime change interventionism is consistently disastrous. People who say they want Trump to remove Maduro are admitting they never grew up.
________________
The best way to make sure you see everything I write is to get on my free mailing list. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.
Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Feature image via Adobe Stock.
A Warning from Lebanon
How Ukrainian Courts Are Weaponizing Lawfare Against Anti-War Voices
‘You Cannot Fight the World’: The Hidden Meaning Behind Trump’s Warning to Israel
Künstliche Intelligenz und das Ende der Kritik?
Der Philosoph und Autor Michael Andrick warnt in einem Beitrag für die Berliner Zeitung, dass die rasante Entwicklung von Künstlicher Intelligenz nicht nur technologische, sondern vor allem kulturelle und philosophische Umbrüche mit sich bringt. Besonders die neuen Formen der generativen und agentischen KI seien in der Lage, zentrale Grundlagen des europäischen Denkens ins Wanken zu bringen.
Andrick erinnert daran, dass europäische Kultur sich seit Platon und dem Christentum durch ein grundlegendes Vertrauen in eine ordnende, verstehbare Welt auszeichnet. Sowohl Platons Demiurg, der sich beim Erschaffen der Welt an ewige Ideen halten müsse, als auch der christliche Gott, dessen Schöpfung einem moralischen Plan folge, stünden für die Idee einer «gebundenen Schöpfung», so der Autor. Aus dieser Vorstellung habe sich über Jahrhunderte hinweg ein kulturelles Prinzip entwickelt: dass Menschen berechtigt und verpflichtet seien, Zustände zu hinterfragen – immer unter Berufung auf übergeordnete, rational fassbare Maßstäbe.
Mit dem Aufkommen generativer KI, die etwa realistisch wirkende Texte, Bilder oder Videos produziert, sieht Andrick dieses Prinzip bedroht. Denn derartige Technologien schüfen «weite Bedeutungsräume», in denen die üblichen Formen der Kritik nicht mehr greifen könnten. Wo Wirklichkeit sich nicht mehr auf gemeinsame, überprüfbare Maßstäbe gründe, werde sie beliebig manipulierbar – und damit dem rationalen Diskurs entzogen.
«Chaos existiert für uns Europäer traditionell nicht», schreibt Andrick, doch die neuen KI-Systeme erzeugten genau das: eine Wirklichkeit ohne Orientierung, der man sich nur noch unterwerfen oder ganz entziehen könne.
Noch kritischer bewertet er die sogenannte «agentische» KI: Systeme, die im Rahmen definierter Aufgaben selbstständig Entscheidungen treffen und handeln. Diese Technologien, so Andrick, verfügten zwar nicht über echte Urteilskraft, agierten aber mit einer «in sich dynamischen Rationalität», indem sie auf ein Ziel hin optimierten. In einer Welt, in der solche Systeme in immer mehr Bereichen menschliche Akteure ersetzen – von Design über Pflege bis hin zu militärischen Einsätzen –, stelle sich die Frage, ob der Mensch nicht Gefahr laufe, sich selbst zu «robotisieren».
Für Andrick ist damit eine Grenze erreicht, die frühere technische Revolutionen – von der Dampfmaschine bis zur digitalen Kommunikation – nie überschritten hätten:
«Bisher konnte keine Technikgeneration diesen Tiefenzug abendländischen Lebens und Denkens überschreiben», betont er.
Die aktuellen Entwicklungen aber unterhöhlten genau jene metaphysische Grundstruktur, auf der Europas Idee von Aufklärung, Wissenschaft und politischer Reform fuße.
Ob diese neue Realität noch reformierbar sei, lässt der Autor offen. Klar wird jedoch: Wer Künstliche Intelligenz nur als Werkzeug sieht, unterschätzt ihre kulturelle Sprengkraft.